Ep 200. - Unpacking Islamophobia: Drone Warfare, Refugees and The Hijab with Dr Amina Shareef

You can also listen to the episode using the links below, remember to subscribe so you never miss a show

AppleSpotify • GoogleStitcher • or on Alexa

Please leave us a review on Apple Podcasts and a rating on Spotify - it helps us reach a wider audience

Islamophobia across the Western world is on the rise. It is a pernicious prejudice that seems to have seeped into public acceptance. It is not just the prize of the ultra right, across the West, even liberal minded governments have sought to malign Muslims unjustly. Consider President Macron’s separatism Act, that maligns in effect any believer that follows the shariah. Or consider at home, the Labour government’s reluctance to recognise anti Muslim hatred as a cause of the most recent riots across northern England. Or the US administration downplaying the murder of Palestinians.

My guest today, Dr Amina Shareef argues that Islamophobia is more than a visceral hatred. It is a death dealing project. It aims to dehumanise, and expose Muslim populations to death. Dr Amina is an academic specialising in anti-Muslim racism, Islamophobia and the war on terror policies, practices and its impact upon Muslims . You can find Dr Amina Shareef here: Website: https://aminashareef.com/ Twitter: @AminaShareef1

You can also support The Thinking Muslim through a one-time donation: https://www.thinkingmuslim.com/Donate

Follow us on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/jalalayn and https://twitter.com/thinking_muslim

Join our Telegram group here: https://t.me/thinkingmuslim

Sign up to Muhammad Jalal’s newsletter https://jalalayn.substack.com

Transcript - This is an automated transcript and may not reflect the actual conversation

Introduction

0:00

I am definitely saying that the end game of  anti-muslim racism is death itself things like  

0:05

the hijab things like the beard things like Muslim  practice prayer so on and so forth they racialize  

0:11

going on about islamophobia breeds a sense of  victimhood the terrorist is outside of this   rules-based order therefore stuck in the state  of nature there are certain lives that matter  

0:20

and certain lives that don't Gaza has really made  it clear without any Shadow of Doubt that Muslim  

0:26

life it simply doesn't matter there's this image  of a Christian Europe that is being invaded by the  

0:31

Muslim migrant islamophobia or anti-muslim racism  is a tool used by Muslims to avoid uh criticisms  

0:38

of of Islam as a faith we know one of the  representations of Muslim woman only knowable as a   victim she's a victim of Muslim misogyny Islamic  patriarchy whatever you want to call it to be  

0:49

anti-feminist is to be anti- civilizational and we  don't pay enough attention to the the place of the

0:54

hijab islamophobia across for West World Is  On The Rise it is a pentious Prejudice that  

1:03

seems to have seeped into public acceptance  it is just not the prize of the allra right  

1:10

across the West even liberal-minded governments  have sought to malign Muslims unjustly consider  

1:16

president macron's separatism act it maligns  in effect any believer that follows the Sharia  

1:22

or consider at home the labor government's  reluctance to recognize anti-muslim hatred  

1:27

as a cause of the most recent riots across  Northern England or the US Administration  

1:33

downplaying the murder of Palestinians my guest  today do am Sharif argues that islamophobia is  

1:41

more than a visceral hatred it is a death dealing  project it aims to dehumanize and expose Muslim  

1:48

populations to death Dr armina is an academic  specializing in anti-muslim racism islamophobia  

1:55

and the war on terror policies practices and its  impact upon Muslims Dr Shar welcome back to the  

2:02

fing Muslim alayum thanks for having me well  it's great to have you with us and um I think  

2:09

today's conversation is is a really important  one uh we're just ending islamophobia awareness  

2:15

month and there's a lot of conversation uh in the  press or maybe less so probably this year about  

2:21

islamophobia now um what struck me when we had  a preliminary discussion about this subject is  

2:28

you define Islam islamophobia as a deaf dealing  project um what do you mean by this yes so this  

Death Dealing project?

2:37

perspective is most certainly an unusual one  and it definitely needs unpacking and it needs  

2:43

unpacking very slowly and so I want to do it very  concretely to begin with right so I want to do it  

2:50

by looking at what life for Muslims looks like  both in the UK and more broadly right so let's  

2:56

begin with the UK uh we know that British Muslims  face a higher highest levels of unemployment  

3:02

relative to their uh National counterparts we  know that if you're um if you have a Muslim  

3:07

sounding name you're three times less likely  to receive an offer for an interview uh we know  

3:13

that British Muslims face the highest reported  levels of poor health for the age fracket about  

3:19

uh 50 years old um over half or nearly half  of uh so 40 to 48% of Pakistani and Bengali  

3:30

women in this country have no qualifications at  all uh British Muslim women are 1.5 times more  

3:38

likely to not receive epidural pain relief during  child birth uh 2.1% more likely to be in prolonged  

3:46

labor and 2 uh 4% more likely to experience  postpartum hemorrhaging right the list goes  

3:54

on and on I could give you many more statistics  but let's pause there and interpret them okay  

4:00

one way to interpret these statistics would be to  say that these statistics are evidence of Muslim  

4:07

exclusion from education Healthcare health  and and employment yeah another perspective  

4:14

or another approach would be to say these  statistics are evidence of the slow death of   a population right because what happens when you  are dis deprived from education from employment  

4:25

from health health and healthare but slow self  right and so this this is a perspective that   I take and this this perspective becomes a bit  more compelling when you consider other metrics  

4:36

the fact that British Muslims are subjected to  death and injury on the street uh they experience  

4:42

high levels of poverty such as uh crowding uh in  housing and so on and so forth right but let's  

4:48

look outside of the the UK for a moment here  to sort of um consolidate this argument that  

4:53

I'm making let's take um Refugee debts in the  Mediterranean due to cross right uh between the  

5:01

years 2015 and 21 there were an estimated 20,000  Refugee debts in the Mediterranean many of them  

5:09

are Muslim let's take drone Warfare between the  years 2004 and 2018 uh there were an estimated  

5:18

6,500 deaths due to uh targeted killing by drones  and say most of them were Muslim in the countries  

5:26

of Yemen Pakistan and um Afghanistan let's also  look at uh refugee camps there are refugee camps  

5:38

that house Syrian refugees in Lebanon turkey and  Jordan there are almost 800,000 Syrian refugees  

5:46

languishing in these camps that's nearly 1 million  living in conditions between life and death right  

5:52

and we could interpret what we what we have with  these statistics is evidence of slow death and  

6:00

actual death for Muslim populations and so this  is why I say that anti-muslim racism creates the  

6:06

conditions for the premature death of Muslim  populations I mean I find what you say there  

Prejudice and End game

6:12

pretty interesting very interesting because you're  linking what seems like disperate a disperate set  

6:18

of Statistics towards Muslims domestically and  internationally and are you arguing that they're  

6:26

all very much linked to a Prejudice that has taken  hold and that prejudice is leading to the slow or  

6:33

the quick death if if we come to drone Warfare the  quick death of of Muslims is that your argument   almost there a there's a conveyor belt here and  the end result is is death I am definitely saying  

6:45

that the endgame of anti-muslim racism is death  itself and sometimes what we do with our analysis  

6:52

of anti-muslim racism or islamophobia is we sort  of we sort of look at the origin right we say okay  

6:58

it's rooted in Prejudice it's Ed in bias um it's  expressed through discrimination but what happens  

7:05

as a result of that we're not necessarily telling  that story so what I'm saying is I'm taking  

7:12

exclusion from Healthcare and health education  and employment and saying what is the consequence  

7:17

of all of that right and I'm drawing of course  on um theories that have been presented by you  

7:24

know black um the black tradition on racism to say  that look what we have a situ is a situation where  

7:32

um Muslim populations are facing you know various  forms of death right including physical death now  

7:39

my approach to anti-muslim racism recognizes that  it's not just interpersonal right it's not just  

7:45

between a victim and a perpetrator on the street  it's not just between a victim and a perpetrator   in a place of um employment or in an educational  setting it's also between you know Muslim people  

7:59

and states right Muslim people and policy  institutions legal regimes state apparatuses  

8:05

right and so it's that personal and that  interpersonal and that institutional sort  

8:11

of uh Focus that I take when I do my analysis on  anti-muslim racism so you've used two words here  

8:18

anti-muslim racism and islamophobia uh I know  we we spoke briefly about it on our previous  

8:24

in our previous discussion uh but tell me if  there is a difference between the two and one  

8:29

you use islamophobia and anti-muslim racism as as  uh as as a way of explaining this Phenom I prefer  

8:38

to use anti-muslim racism not because I don't not  because I think islamophobia is not a valid term  

8:45

right we have all this debate and discussion about  islamophobia being insufficient or inadequate to  

8:52

describe what Muslims are facing today because  we somehow think that we can sort of peer into  

8:58

the emology of a word and say this is what this  word means for us now right but we don't do that  

9:04

for other words like carpet for example we're  not looking into the emology of that word and  

9:10

saying this is therefore what it means right so  we can't we can't either neither can we do that  

9:15

for islamophobia and say Islam and phobia and  therefore it's a kind of fear um with regards to  

9:21

Muslim people that's not the approach that I take  yeah um so I want to emphasize that islamophobia  

9:29

is is is a project it's a racial project  it's a political project that's racial in   character yeah and so to keep that emphasis on  the racial character of islamophobia I use the  

9:40

term anti-muslim racism and then we'll get  to later perhaps how I am approaching and  

9:45

understanding uh racism itself well let's maybe  maybe discuss so I understand that the APG the  

Anti-Islam vs Islamophobia

9:51

all party parliamentary group on uh islamophobia  anti-muslim racism they prefer to use this term  

9:58

anti-muslim racism as a as a way to describe this  phenomenon um but but in a s i I've heard from  

10:05

critics of uh of the APG who argue that it doesn't  go far enough because the what we're seeing here  

10:14

is a prejudice against a Muslim not necessarily  because of their race or racial characteristic   although that may be there but actually it's  because of their observance of Islam or what  

10:23

they perceive to be Islam sure so for example  the conversation we had last time about a young  

10:29

person wanting to conduct Praise In Schools uh  wasn't that less about their color and know that's  

10:37

not just what racism is but it wasn't less about  their color and more about their Islam so would an  

10:43

islamophobia in a way be more adequate term that's  a really important question and I'm glad you  

10:48

raised it because you are making reference to this  very popular argument that we find in across the  

10:54

political Spectrum right center and left and it  goes like this Muslims are not race and therefore  

11:00

islamophobia is not a form of racism yeah now this  argument is based on an unspoken assumption the  

11:08

assumption is that you have races okay people who  are divided on the basis of some kind of external  

11:14

feature whether that's hair texture skin color eye  shape lip size skull size so on and so forth and  

11:21

then those races experience racism as a result so  what this assumption is doing is telling a chicken  

11:28

and egg story it's saying that racist came first  and then racism followed because of it but what  

11:35

if we flipped the script what if we said racism  came first and then races or racialized categories  

11:42

followed because of it right because after all  that is what we did we looked out onto the Sea  

11:50

of human difference and one we tried to categorize  this difference on the basis of external features  

11:57

right the the hair color the the hair texture the  skin color the ey shap that I just referred to and  

12:03

then two we've tried to name these differences  white black brown red yellow and then three we  

12:10

organize these differences or these categories  uh on some hierarchy with white being at the  

12:16

top uh inferior and brown black yellow red in some  relation of inferiority what I'm trying to say is  

12:23

that this process this process of racialization  or racism created right these categories and  

12:31

then established the relationships between these  categories and so there's two competing stories  

12:38

here racism race came first and then racism  followed or racism came first and races followed  

12:44

if we take the second story then we can say anti  Muslim racism created Muslim created the Muslim  

12:52

as a racial category it decided anti-muslim racism  decided that there's something biologic essential  

13:00

to muslimness for example a proclivity towards  political violence right a pent for misogyny a  

13:08

propensity for irrationality and extremism various  other tendenc Tendencies so if we take that Second  

13:15

Story which is that racism came first and then  because of that you have racialized groups yeah  

13:21

you can challenge this idea that islamophobia is  not a form of racism and then we can begin to use  

13:27

the language of racism to talk talk about even  religious discrimination okay so that's really  

13:32

really well explained um I'd never understood it  like that just have look at for explaining like   that now just to finish off the conversation then  um so imagine if a a convert um a white convert  

Racializing hijab

13:45

say of course you can be racist towards a white  person but imagine if a convert uh became Muslim  

13:51

and started to wear the hijab at work and as a  result faced Prejudice from her boss or from her  

13:58

co-workers um would that person be comfortable  in defining themselves uh as or defining the  

14:06

Prejudice as a racial project or a or a project  against a religious grouping I hope you understand  

14:14

yeah I'm not quite sure how that specific  person would imagine their experiences but  

14:19

as a researcher of antim Muslim racism I would say  regardless of the skin color of the person wearing  

14:25

the hijab yeah her experience is an experience of  racism because the processes that have meant that  

14:33

a racial meaning have been given to the hijab or  the same processes of racialization that black  

14:39

people experien right that other minoritized  racialized groups have experienced because that  

14:44

process is the same then it makes sense then  to call that experience racism yeah so is in  

14:52

effect your suggesting that now that this person  has made a a move to become a Muslim they're now  

14:59

othered they seem to be different to the host or  to the majority population and they're now seem  

15:05

to be part of the opponents camp or the camp that  one needs to apply this level of prejudice to I  

15:12

think things like the hijab things like the beard  things like uh Muslim practice prayer so on and so  

15:20

forth they racialize right so it's not just okay  so just before I mentioned that you know external  

15:28

features yeah were used historically to racialize  groups hair color hair texture skin color so on  

15:33

and so forth right for Muslim people because we  come from all you know colors black white brown  

15:40

red yellow for us it's it's our Islamic practice  that becomes the defining feature of our racial  

15:47

difference right and so let's just take the hijab  here for a second the hijab can be racialized it  

15:53

can be given a racial meaning and the same way  skin color was given a racial meaning skin color  

15:59

was taken as an indicator of a racial difference  an indicator of some kind of biological difference  

16:06

in a black person yeah and so if that same racial  signification can be given to the hijab then the  

16:13

we then sort of uh develops this racial alterity  because of wearing it and so the experience is  

16:21

deeply racial and what about the argument uh so I  do want to get to this you know your AR your major  

Victimhood

16:29

uh point which is you know islamophobia is a  de defining project and I think it's a really   fascinating conversation to have uh but what about  the argument of some Muslims who suggest for going  

16:38

on about islamophobia and Ines commas um breeds  a sense of victimhood uh we know that there's  

16:44

Prejudice out there we know that there are people  who dislike us and we know that Islam features  

16:50

very strongly in this Prejudice and our practice  of Islam but uh why do we need to even classify  

16:58

the IDE of of Islam phobia like our parents  who face very visceral uh anger on the street  

17:05

Sometimes They carried on and made a good life for  themselves you know I think it's really important  

17:11

to do the work that you know researchers and um  you know think tanks and uh Grassroots nonprofit  

17:20

organizations are doing around islamophobia in  terms of defining it first and then acting against  

17:25

it right we cannot develop any kind of iCal policy  legal intervention against something that doesn't  

17:33

exist that is amorphous that has no definition so  what we're doing when we talk about islamophobia  

17:39

is saying look there is a shared experience  right that is lived by Muslims in the UK and  

17:46

more broadly and this shared experience has a set  of patterns and these patterns we're going to sort  

17:53

of intellectualize them we're going to track their  genealogies back to particular policies back to  

17:58

particular histories back to particular discourses  and in so in so doing what we do is we create a  

18:04

picture about the political project that is racial  and character that Muslims are experiencing and  

18:11

then by doing so we're able to strategize right  come up with action plans mobilize people uh  

18:19

raise money we can't do any of that unless we've  done that preliminary groundwork of establishing   what it is that we're fighting against you  discuss drone Warfare as part of this project of  

Drone warfare

18:30

anti-muslim racism or islamophobia um what is it  about drone Warfare and it's um it's it's a tool  

18:38

of War how how do we make the link between uh this  horrific way of of killing people and islamophobia  

18:47

explain that link to me please okay so if I  am coming with the argument that anti-islam   racism exposes Muslim populations to premature  death then how is that facilitated that's what  

18:57

we need to answer first to answer the question  how does drone Warfare contribute to that okay  

19:03

I think it's really important to take into account  the war on terror and securitization when it comes   to discussion of anti racism it is the political  Matrix it is what gives meaning to anti-muslim  

19:15

racism today right for me that's that's the  approach that I take securitization is critical in  

19:23

constructing Muslim Life Is killable Life explain  securitization to right so securitization is is a  

19:29

process by which a particular population is  deemed to be a threat right very simply um  

19:36

there are other perspectives on that but I think  that's uh a good place to start now let me explain  

19:42

this by looking at the figure of the terrorist  okay the figure of the terrorist was constructed  

19:48

by terrorism discourses terrorism discourses  are discourses that Tred to demarcate between  

19:56

legitimate violence and illegitimate violence  right so legitimate violence is a violence  

20:01

of militaries of um intelligence agencies of  private security forces acting at the behest  

20:07

of State actors who are part of a rules-based  order okay illegitimate violence is violence  

20:15

that is uh enacted by non-state actors who are  challenging The Sovereign power and the Imperial  

20:21

projects in the state violence of this category  of violence right so in other words illegitimate  

20:27

violence is known is made Noble as terrorism and  its actors are made Noble as terrorists now the  

20:34

terrorist it's important to know is outside of  this rules-based order okay it's outside of the  

20:40

rule of law and therefore is stuck in the state  of nature what terrorism discourses are trying to   say is that Those who commit acts of terrorism  do so out of some kind of ingrained biological  

20:50

penchant for committing irrational violence right  what I'm trying to say is that the terrorist is a  

20:56

racialized category of okay it's a category of a  population that hasn't progressed into the rule of  

21:02

law for reasons that emerge at the intersection  of biology and culture okay now what the figure  

21:07

of the terrorist does is that it allows an entire  population to be securitized right and racialized  

21:16

as a threat and to be racialized as killable  therefore why what do we do when we have a threat  

21:22

a threat we know needs to be eliminated okay and  so securitization makes Muslim life kill the life  

21:30

and it makes the depth of Muslim populations  not just normalized but even necessary for  

21:35

the flourishing of a particular population that  is deemed at risk from the risk the threatening  

21:43

Muslim terrorist yeah that's that's really um  fascinating um but but you know we are led to  

Otherization

21:49

believe that the rules-based order is meant to  strip away uh this Prejudice from uh essentially  

21:59

who have coined this term and so everyone in the  world is is meant to be treated equally and uh  

22:06

States uh set up these International Norms  in order to make sure that um uh people are  

22:13

not otherizing people do not feel that uh their  Community or their grouping uh is of lesser worth  

22:20

and lesser value so I suppose I and and as I'm  saying I know how hypocritical all of that sounds  

22:26

to all of us but you know how does how does one  get away with uh that level of prejudice that you  

22:33

described when you've got this world that's meant  to have moved Beyond uh civilization at least  

22:39

moveed Beyond uh this um this dark world that  inhabited you know this be sort of global space  

22:46

premodernity really important question to ask in  the context of the ongoing genocide um in Gaza H  

22:55

my view on this is that and this is a view that I  share with other Scholars of racism yeah which is  

23:02

that the law and the universals that are enshrined  in law have a limit right okay and that limit  

23:14

stops at the limit of the human right what do I  mean by that I referred to it earlier we looked  

23:20

at at the Sea of human difference and we said oh  these are humans and these are animals and this  

23:26

is another species and so on and so forth right  what is the limit of the human it is a category  

23:32

of people that we wouldn't see as fully human and  that perhaps we would even dismiss them as animals  

23:40

we've dehumanized them right so this International  order that we're talking about it has an edge and  

23:45

it stops at the limit of the human wow and at  the limit the limit is populated by people who  

23:51

haven't been given who haven't been deemed to who  aren't seen as having full personhood right and so  

23:59

therefore they're not elgible for the protections  and guarantees that enshrined in international  

24:05

humanitarian law for example and that's why we  continuously see violations of international  

24:10

humanitarian law because these people were never  considered applicable for the universals that  

24:16

enshrined in law in the first place they're  outside of this judical order if we go back   to your question on drone Warfare yeah we will we  can illustrate this okay Joan Warfare it emerged  

24:29

during the Bush Administration and massively  expanded during the Obama Administration and  

24:36

it emerged as an alternative to uh capturing  and detaining uh suspected terrorists at the  

24:43

US prison um in guantan Bay Cuba now the purpose  of uh Joan Warfare is not to counter an attack  

24:54

but to preempt the the possibility of a Potential  Threat from developing right in other words it's  

25:02

a form of counterinsurgency uh in which death is  the technique of power okay as the Obama drone  

25:11

Doctrine uh stated kill rather them capture so  there's this ne ne this there's this NE there's  

25:18

this necropolitical logic here which is kill them  before they kill us right so drone Warfare is all  

25:24

about killing right and it doesn't uphold inter  ational requirements legal requirements to make  

25:31

a distinction between combatants and civilians why  the kill radius right of a drone strike is 15 met  

25:38

from the point of impact right so anybody  within that kill zone is dead essentially  

25:46

these International requirements to observe the  distinction between combatants and civilians is  

25:51

in fact dismissed by the US which has redefined a  legitimate Target as any military AED men within  

25:58

the Kill Zone right which has enabled innocent  people uh to be killed on the basis of Guilty  

26:05

By Association and in fact innocent people die all  the time in drone Warfare and drone strikes uh and  

26:12

Obama's very first drone attack okay drone strike  uh in 2009 killed 20 civilians after it mistook a  

26:22

yemeni bedwin village for a terrorist training  camp okay now going back to our discussion  

26:29

how is it possible for drone Warfare to have  persisted for all these years right except if  

26:37

the international order accepted that it had  a limit and that its legal jurisdiction didn't  

26:43

cover a particular category of people who were  on the limit of what we count as fully human  

26:51

right and so that limit of what is and what isn't  fully human we can see that played out in in say  

Muslim lives

26:58

Ukraine where the Russians do use drones against  Ukrainian cities but the Uproar uh when there are  

27:06

civilian deaths is is a hundred times worse  it's more intense than any deaths in in say  

27:13

Somalia or in yenon or in daza today is that is  that what you're saying so in a sense your your  

27:18

basically your basic argument is that European  lives or those who look very similar to Europeans  

27:25

are far more valuable in their eyes is than the  lives of Muslims it's what the black lives matter  

27:33

movement has been telling us for years now there  are certain lives that matter and certain lives   that don't and Muslim lives don't matter within  that calculation okay uh we are seeing that  

27:43

play out on our screens now with the ongoing  genocide in Gaza yeah uh the biggest lesson  

27:49

that we are learning with this genocide is that  Muslim life doesn't matter and that there is no   International Community that is going to guarantee  its protection uh we always knew this we always  

27:59

knew this uh because we were seeing it in the case  of the rohinga we were seeing this in the case of  

28:05

the abandonment of the Syrian people we are seeing  this in uh the Detention of weaker Muslims right  

28:11

but Gaza has really made it clear now without  any shadow of a doubt that Muslim life it simply  

28:19

doesn't matter right simply doesn't matter there  may be um some comments that we get we get a lot  

Muslim tradition

28:25

of comments from non-muslims who uh who riew a  program and some of them are faithful and some  

28:31

of them are not like Muslims maybe but there are  some non-muslims who will push back and say well  

28:37

fine but you would never get this level of moral  morality in any ideology so Muslims would have a  

28:43

similar discernment in in the case of Muslims it  would be Muslims versus non-muslims so we would  

28:49

attentionally historically see the lives of of  non-muslims as lesser like isn't this just sort of  

28:55

uh part and parel of what it means to be a member  of a civilization or would you argue that there is  

29:00

something different about Muslims and Islam when  it comes to human life I think I would push back  

29:06

on the idea that within a Muslim majority context  we might value Muslim life over a non-muslim life  

29:14

but I don't think that's what you're saying anyway  right I think um there is very clear indication  

29:19

in our religious tradition or SC scriptural  tradition that you know Allah has given dignity  

29:25

to all of humanity right and that dignity comes  with that the fitra that he's put in us and and  

29:33

that sacred purpose that he has given us and you  know this chance that he's given us to to earn um  

29:41

what we believe awaits those who believe and do  good uh work towards the Hereafter we wouldn't  

29:49

necessarily reproduce we wouldn't I don't think  a Muslim society would reproduced a white Western  

29:57

civilizational structure and a Muslim majority  kind of uh political Arrangement because if our  

30:04

Arrangement our political Arrangement leans on our  sacred scripture right which has given dignity to  

30:10

human life regardless of its belief in God or  not yeah then we wouldn't we wouldn't do what  

30:18

they have done to us right I strongly believe that  we would not do that and I also believe that you  

30:26

know the pressor cannot the Press cannot become  the oppressor right we cannot think that we are  

30:32

going to dismantle these systems of racism only  to become racist ourself right we are dismantling  

30:39

this system because we are bringing a new vision  right a new vision to to humanity in terms of how  

30:45

it should be arranged and how life chances should  be distributed and how Humanity should be valued  

30:52

that's what the Muslim project on this Earth is  right it's about coming with this new vision and   so I strongly push back against people who would  suggest we would do the same thing and uh refugees  

Refugees

31:02

uh we have seen uh large numbers of refugees over  the last decade or just under a decade uh many of  

31:08

them crossing the Mediterranean and many of them  dying on in the Mediterranean or in their Journey  

31:14

for Europe or of course uh across the English  Channel uh between France and the UK and you  

31:22

argue that this is part of this project also it's  killing Muslim life explain this idea to me please  

31:28

right so as you said we know that refugees are  taking irregular roots to migration because there  

31:37

are no legal Roots made available yeah we know  that they're crossing the Mediterranean on very  

31:42

unseaworthy vessels right rubber boats and all  sorts of vessels that simply cannot cross what  

31:49

the UN has defined to be one of the most dangerous  migration routs right the central Mediterranean  

31:55

yeah and yet what has been the response to M uh  Refugee Crossing in the Mediterranean NOS have  

32:03

launched launched search and rescue operations  right which means they go out and sea they   search The Horizon they find refugees they bring  them on board they bring them safely to Europe  

32:13

what has been the EU response to NG NGO search  and rescue operations it has been to contract  

32:18

search and rescue operational capabilities right  and other words stop NOS from rescuing refugees  

32:25

at Sea how by Prosecuting NOS on the basis of  facilitating illegal immigration by impounding  

32:34

and seizing NGO vessels by finding crew members  in some cases up to1 million euros okay um by  

32:44

not allowing disembarkation at National ports  and also by not allowing rescue ships to enter  

32:52

Waters where distress calls are likely to be  found right so what we see here is EU policy  

32:58

what is essentially EU policy to Refugee um to  a refugee crisis is an abandonment to death in  

33:07

the med Mediterranean right and this is where I  believe the abandonment to death and the killing  

33:15

of Muslim life becomes blurred this distinction  becomes blurred right how how can you uphold  

33:21

the distinction between abandoning to death and  killing a particular form of life and so this is  

33:27

why I do think that EU response to migration  across the Mediterranean has been a form of  

33:35

exposing Len life to death itself and and how do  we create or how did they create the conditions  

33:40

of prematur death okay so just to connect  the two then securitization creates those  

33:46

conditions for refugees to be seen as you know  disposable life abandon life life that's killable  

33:55

yeah uh you can leave them to die at the sea  because their security threats right they um  

34:00

are a threat to the flourishing of our nation  not just existentially right demographically  

34:06

because so we quote unquote outproduce um our  white female counterparts but also because we  

34:13

um come with this ideological difference right we  come with Islam and if you look at anti- migrant  

34:22

discourse which is really anti-refugee discourse  yeah uh there's this image of a Christian Europe  

34:28

that is being invaded right by the Muslim migrant  even though migrants can also come in different  

34:34

uh come from different religious backgrounds like  uh uh Ukrainian refugees right there's this idea  

34:39

that migrants are Muslims and our migration to  Europe is this project of demographic Jihad of  

34:47

islamization we're seeking to supplant the white  population or a population defined through this  

34:52

imagined whiteness and um we want to replace also  uh Western civilizational values right and so I  

35:01

think the securitization of Muslims the threat  that we pose both existentially and ideologically  

35:06

means that we can as a as a na as a continent uh  essentially have a defacto policy that abandons  

35:14

Muslim life to death how widely do you feel this  project has been embraced by society and of course  

Project accepted?

35:21

it seems like it's a political project but but it  must have uh some level of credit ability amongst  

35:29

populations I'm I do remember during the brexit uh  referendum niga frage had uh a poster behind him  

35:36

of a Quee of refugees and they're all Muslims from  Syria and um you know it's very clear that was a  

35:42

dog whistle to islamophobia it was very clear that  he was referring to the Muslim you know as you  

35:49

just describe it the Muslims are there the Muslim  hordes are here to conquer Europe uh how widely  

35:55

accepted do you feel that that project is within  Western populations you know here in the UK I  

36:02

would say it's it's really institutionalized right  just in the recent elections I remember getting on  

36:08

my Twitter feed a election uh video made by the  labor party right no so it was the conservative  

36:15

party and in this video um the the video was about  why labor is bad for the UK right and in this  

36:25

image uh it was there was a beach right probably  do where you know um migrant uh were Channel  

36:34

Crossing refugees land yeah and there was like  a red carpet that was rolled out right so this  

36:41

is this is a video made by the conservative party  um about a mainstream election and it demonstrates  

36:50

therefore that anti-migrant discourse has taken  hold at taken hold of our political system at  

36:56

the very heart and it's at the very heart of our  political system right yeah uh further evidence   that this uh anti-migrant discourse which is  really anti-refugee discourse I really don't like  

37:06

to call it anti-migrant discourse anti-refugee  discourse um was there in the Southport riots the  

37:13

post Southport riots right uh stop the boats that  was the chance that um these farite riers were  

Rights and left

37:21

chanting as they committed all sorts of violence  in my introduction I uh suggested that it's not  

37:27

just the prize of the far right but it seed into  broader discourse and especially you know when it  

37:34

comes to so-called allies of Muslims you know  more liberal-minded or social Democrats um do  

37:39

you find that and and how how do we observe that  that tendency in across the political Spectrum  

37:47

we see anti-refugee discourse in the fact that  we have as a un response to the refugee crisis  

37:57

today refugee camps okay let me explain this yeah  refugee camps are politically rationalized and  

38:05

popularly imagined as a humanitarian response to  force displacement but the fact of the matter is  

38:11

that refugee camps are more or less in violation  of international communitarian law right State  

38:18

signatories have a requirement to offer uh  refugees three options one repatriation back  

38:23

to their home country two uh Asylum and second  country or three resettlement in a third country  

38:31

but what we have are Syrian refugees trapped in  these camps for protracted situ for protracted  

38:38

situations right uh 5 years is already considered  a protracted situation but in fact many of these  

38:45

Syrian refugees are in these camps for upwards  of 10 years now right refugee camps are not meant  

38:51

to be permanent Solutions they're meant to be  temporary stays or Transit Transit places of stay  

38:59

okay um and they're they're highly securitized  they've got exit permits uh they are regulated  

39:05

in ter in terms of who can get in and who can get  out barp wire fencing all of that there's plenty  

39:11

of academic literature that has indicated that  refugee camps are actually a form of containment  

39:18

okay they their purpose is to obstruct the  movement of refugees towards the borders of  

39:26

wealthy Nations where Asylum Claims can be made  yeah in other words the purpose of a refugee camp  

39:32

is to Warehouse unwanted Refugee Asylum claimants  we don't see any Ukrainian refugee camps we see  

39:39

Pathways being opened for refugees to uh Ukrainian  refugees to come legally into the UK we see action  

39:46

plans being made that aim to facilitate the  integration of ukrainians uh Ukrainian refugees  

39:53

in society so there is a marked difference here  right but going back to the refugee camp what  

39:59

you have is is a situation of containment right  of Syrian of Muslim refugees Syrian refugees are  

40:06

essentially Muslim refugees yes and this is a  policy that's adopted this is EU this is United  

40:13

Nations policy right and so going back to your  question to what extent is this anti-refugee  

40:20

discourse institutionalized well the evidence  is the fact that you can have these containment  

40:27

camps which have genealogies by the way with  prisoner of war camps with concentration camps  

40:33

with detention with uh internment camps yeah right  you have these kind of camps to Warehouse some  

40:41

of the most vulnerable people who are escaping  political conflict right and that's policy that's  

40:47

that's that's the strategy by which uh these  people are being dealt with and so that indicates  

40:53

the extent to which these anti-refugee discourses  have become institutionalist how do we respond  

Islamophobia a tool?

40:59

to uh many who fight back who push back and argue  that islamophobia or anti-muslim racism is a tool  

41:07

used by Muslims to avoid uh any uh criticisms of  of Islam as a faith I say we welcome debate and  

41:17

discussion on Islam and Muslims yeah okay I say  bring your discussions about what's wrong with  

41:26

Islam from a philosophical perspective from an  from a scriptural perspective from a theological  

41:32

perspective but the fact of the matter is that  most islamophobes and those who turn out this  

41:38

kind of islamophobic um representation they know  very little about Islam and Muslims and they come  

41:46

with these tired ideas and lazy ideas about who  we are and what Islam is that isn't rooted in any  

41:52

kind of intellectual engage with the S so that's  what we what we have problem with not with an  

41:58

intelligent uh appro uh discussion with Islam but  this but this approach that produces racializing  

42:06

images of Islam and Muslims that then Expos his  Muslim populations to premature death and all  

42:12

of that masquerades as critique of of religion  right that's what we have a problem with we have  

42:19

a problem when former ukip counselor Eric kitson  right we know this tweet he's uh it's a tweet in  

42:26

which there's a pig wearing a hat that says Allah  LA on it and he spit roasting a Muslim over a fire  

42:32

that's fueled by the Quran we have a problem with  that kind of imagery right and we have a problem   with the crown prosecution the crown prosecution  Services which ruled that that treat was not  

42:42

incitement to religious hatred right and so so  I point on incitement to religious hatred right  

42:49

yes we have laws in the UK that um adjudicate  that and we also have law that laws that protect  

42:58

um the right to critique religion in the UK  it's the religious and racial hatred Act of  

43:04

200 six now this act it uh defied incitement to  religious hatred as a new criminal offense and  

43:13

it was careful to protect the right to criticize  religion and so it defined incitement to religious   hatred as any uh any speech act or behavior that's  threatening and then the publication and circul  

43:27

ation and displaying of written material  that threatens okay so this act essentially  

43:33

prescribed a very narrow Rage of speech acts  right or behaviors that are both threatening  

43:42

and can that are intended to incite to  religious hatred okay what this act did  

43:50

essentially is that it fails that it made it  virtually impossible to prosecute incitement  

43:56

for Rel religious hatred one because it's very  difficult to prove intent and two it failed to  

44:04

recognize that even if speech is not threatening  and doesn't intend to stir up religious hatred  

44:13

if it's if it ridicules for example then it can  racialize and that racialization that racializing  

44:21

capacity exposes populations to violence  death and injury pre premature death right  

44:27

we just if we take the example of Boris Johnson's  comments about Muslim women who were the niov as   being bank robbers and letter boxes that might  not be considered threatening it might not have  

44:37

the intent to uh incite to religious hatred  but it certainly racializes and we know that  

44:45

as soon as population is racialized then violence  becomes legitimate against them let's talk about  

Women

44:50

uh the islamophobia and women in particular Muslim  women in particular because I do feel that it's a  

44:57

different variants of discrimination um that men  may be uh I mean talk me through through that like  

45:05

how how do women face face discrimination face  islamophobia I think Muslim women face the same  

45:13

conditions of premature death yeah as Muslim  men through M misdistribution of employment  

45:18

Education Health and Healthcare opportunities and  Provisions right yeah however I think Muslim women  

45:24

are more likely to face anti-muslim raal violence  on the street we know that statistically uh Muslim  

45:30

women are also more likely to uh be vulnerable to  spiritual death uh because of legal moves to ban  

45:38

the hijab and other forms of um uh Islamic  trust for Muslim women yeah and we talked  

45:45

about spiritual death being the topic for another  conversation uh Muslim women we tend to be visible  

45:52

as well and so we be the brunt of you know social  hostility and mistreat M and social isolation and  

45:59

so on and so forth now I think what we understate  is the importance of gender to the securitization  

46:09

of Muslim populations right let me explain this  we know one of the representations of Muslim  

46:15

women is the representation of what sh Rak calls  the emper of Muslim woman it's this Muslim woman  

46:21

who is only knowable as a victim right she's  a victim of Muslim misogyny Islamic patriarchy   whatever you want to call it um she's this victim  of forced marriages polygamous marriages child  

46:32

marriages terrorist marriages right shum um  she's a victim of FGM honor killings the whole  

46:38

nine yards but this image the imperal Muslim  woman she allows Islam and Muslim men to be  

46:48

constructed as anti-feminist right and this gender  oppression that Muslim women supposedly face is  

46:57

on the hijab such that it becomes a symbol of  isam's hatred for Muslim women now in this age  

47:05

of so-called gender equality in which the West  sort of has designated itself as the flag bear to  

47:14

be anti-feminist is to be anti-civilization and so  this gender um this gender Dimension allows Islam  

47:24

to be situated Islam and Muslim men to be situ  uated in opposition to Civ civilizational values  

47:30

I.E as an ideological threat and so now that  ideological threat that Islam and Muslims face   or pose articulates with the existential threat  that they posed the ter the TR the the threat  

47:41

of terrorism and that together does the work so  the the figure of the imperil Muslim woman does  

47:50

the work of securitizing Muslim populations and  so gender is so incredibly Central to the this  

47:57

project of anisim racism and I think we don't pay  attention enough to it and we don't pay enough  

48:03

enough attention to the the place of the hijab  and allowing all of that to happen in the first  

48:08

place and hence um the war in Afghanistan was was  coined as or framed as a war to save Muslim women  

48:17

definely um that's really really interesting so  so where do we go where do we go from here I mean  

What can be done?

48:23

it seems like uh someone watching this may feel  about this is pretty hopeless you know we' we're  

48:29

we're now in a situation where this Prejudice has  seek into everyday life how do we as Muslims fight  

48:36

back how do we respond to this all pervasive  anti-muslim or racism or islamophobia I think  

48:44

what is important to keep in mind is that what is  at stake with anti-muslim racism as I'm defining  

48:53

it as a project that exposes Muslim population to  premature death yeah is life itself right that is  

49:00

what is at stake with anti racism life itself  so sometimes we say if we don't do anything to  

49:07

tackle islamophobia we won't be able to wear  hijabs we won't be able to eat halal meat we   won't be able to build our mosques but I say if we  do nothing about anti-muslim racism then we won't  

49:18

be even alive to worry about those things okay  if we do not act and if we do not act today and  

49:24

if we do not act strategic when we uh thinking  about long-term change then all that awaits us  

49:30

is Step itself okay so what can we do so while  the situation looks Grim I there are plenty of  

49:39

Grassroots community- based movements that have  taken up the government to challenge islamophobia  

49:45

right and I think if you want to do something  just Join one of them for example if you have   legal expertise join the islamophobia Response  Unit which is the charity that seeks or that  

49:54

gives legal support uh to victims of anti-muslim  violence on the street if you have leverage  

50:00

in your workplaces then join Muslim friendly  employers which is another organization that  

50:07

makes sure uh workplaces accommodate practices  such as the hijab prayer Ramadan Eid Hajj so  

50:14

on and so forth um if you have academic expertise  why not join Community the community policy Forum  

50:20

which is a think tank that provides that brings  evidence-based research to policymaking when it  

50:26

um concerns British Fons um there's also educate  against islamophobia right and this is an  

50:33

educational intervention against um islamophobia  and if you're an educator or if you're a teacher  

50:41

then you can be a part of bringing some of  that material into classrooms into other   educational institutions to challenge some of the  representational Frameworks that drive this whole  

50:51

political project of islamophobia um and antimos  racism so there are plenty of ways to get involved  

50:58

if there's a gap yeah in what you see right now at  the moment then set up your initiative but I think  

51:06

what's important is to get involved um recognize  that we have agency we are not victims of  

51:14

islamophobia we should never adopt that framework  okay that has to be banished from our vocabulary  

51:20

that word victim we are not victims we are here  as stewards on this Earth God gave us a purpose  

51:26

okay and that purpose means that no matter what  the political situation is that we are going to  

51:34

strive and we have agency and we are going  to disrupt those political conditions that   purpose is actually what is going to allow us to  surmount any kind of political difficulty because  

51:47

we recognize that purpose is with us no matter  how bad it gets right and that purpose never   changes and so recognize that purpose and look  around you see what's being done be involved and  

52:02

the rest is is to God with Dr an Shar it's really  been a a wonderful conversation and there's a lot  

52:09

of lot there to unpack and maybe we should have  a further conversation especially about the the  

52:14

imperal Muslim woman's uh angle that you raised  there because I think that's really important in   in explaining a lot of how the West frames Muslims  and Islam and in particular foreign policies  

52:26

but thank you very much for your  time today PK thanks for having me please remember to subscribe  to our social media and YouTube  

52:37

channels and head over to our website thinking  muslim.com to sign up to my Weekly Newsletter

English


Previous
Previous

Ep 201. - Islamesque: How Islam Shaped Western Skylines with Diana Darke

Next
Next

Ep 199. - Cultivating Chivalry: Islam and Raising Men with Imam Dawud Walid